- Chapter 8 entitled "Enforcement, Infractions and Penalties" only applies to liquor sellers, not patrons.
- Search for key words: "nud*", "cloth*", penis, pubic, naked and other related words. All references are explicitly tied to performers or dancers
- Read Chapter 7 entitled "Standards of Operation" in full.
- Read Chapter 10 entitled "Limitations on Consumers" in full. Interesting note for future use: § 25-1009 says you can get a $300 fine for drinking and operating a horse-drawn carriage.
So the only patron-related ramifications are the in the Penal Code and are only enforceable if there is a reasonable expectation that it will be seen by the public.
Ironically, I always thought the bar was on somewhat shaky grounds, but in the end it was the fear generated by rumors of the groups members that ultimately caused the event's downfall.
The event ran at times monthly and at other times bi-monthly for 5 1/2 years. I am happy to have been a part of it for exactly one year. Rest in peace naked cocktails, we'll miss you.
Update: Upon subsequent reflection, I think my tenor might have been slightly misleading. DC still has a good amount of activities for gay nudists like myself. In fact, one member has already invited some to an alternative get-together and another has volunteered to host it in the future. My lament is that I appreciated the routine-ness of the event that I fear will likely be lost. The notion of doing something so normal as standing in a bar, but nude. The idea is that even if no one makes any specific plans, even if there's nothing going on, every other Saturday there was naked cocktails.
4 comments:
That's a pity. Though, it is great that such an event lasted this long. In San Francisco, bars do not allow nudity.
I'm slightly bitter about it if you can't tell from my unusually negative tone. I think we (the community) shot ourselves in the foot with this one and it pains me to watch it happen.
hi nudeindc, i dont quite get that bit about the community shooting itself in the foot.are u saying it is not closed by the authorities but by the organisers themselves on the strength of a rumour that it will be raided and patrons fined and arrested? or is it making everyone fearful of the raid and numbers attending have diminished? all from rumours? are there no lawyers amongst u lot to figure out the legality of these things? unless it has been illegal all the time? or the law is vague and no one wants to bring a test case.
The event was nixed by the group itself based on rumors that circulated. I agree, I wish someone asked a lawyer before the well got poisoned. Fear was created that patrons would be arrested and fined.
Post a Comment